HIPAA – URBAN LEGEND OR DID IT JUST GET WORSE?
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently printed the final rule concerning “Nondiscrimination and Wellness Programs in Health Coverage in the Group Market,” also known as the loophole that allows health insurance providers to refuse benefits on a claim that was the result of a motorcycle accident. The final rule is the result of a process that began almost 10 years ago when the interim rules were published in 1997 as a direct result to the original HIPAA (PL-104-191) legislation passed by Congress in 1996.
The idea of not delivering on health insurance coverage has it roots in a much different arena than motorcycles . . . domestic violence. Back in the early 1970’s in California, health insurance providers began exploiting a loophole that would become known as the “wife beater clause,” which essentially allowed insurance companies to not provide repeat coverage for damage done as a result of a heavy-handed husband. The insurance companies claimed that they would provide coverage for the initial incident of domestic violence, but after that they shouldn’t have to because the woman should have left the abusive husband, thus making the subsequent beatings her fault and uninsurable. Being 1970 and being California, that loophole did not last very long, but nevertheless began a troubling trend of insurance providers using every loophole to excuse themselves from paying on claims.
This final rule clarifies who exactly can be refused benefits and how many Americans are affected. The answer in both cases is a lot more than was previously thought. 135 million Americans are in the group insurance market, and every one of them can be refused any health insurance funds under what is called the “sources of injury rule.” The group market makes up the bulk of the insurance market when compared to the 2.5 million who participate in individual plans. Basically, if you have insurance through your job, even if you work for the government, you can be refused coverage of an injury based simply on the source of that injury and nothing else.
Can my employer do that? The answer is absolutely, if they tell you. Employers and insurance providers must provide with a full written or virtual explanation of your insurance plan, and each year after that they must provide you with an update that tallies any additions or reductions in material benefits. So if they are going to exploit this loophole, they simply have to tell you either in the initial book or in the yearly changes. It may be the fine print, but legally that’s ok.
Now for the real question: is it happening? Are insurance companies really denying benefits for hospital bills because the injured party was on a motorcycle instead of in a car? It would seem so, given that the insurance companies’ inherent greed and the practice of making a profit would encourage them to refuse claims whenever they had the legal authority to do so. Just ask any beach house owner in the Gulf Coast right now, and all you will hear about is the outrageous behavior of the insurance companies and how nobody is getting a fair market price for property or belongings lost. Well, it seems that the insurance companies aren’t too preoccupied with motorcyclists or snowmobilists or any other group of Americans potentially affected by this glaring loophole. For the past six months I have been asking for actual examples of individuals who can attest that they have been singled out for riding and have had to pay hospital bills out of pocket because they were hurt while doing some riding on a properly-licensed bike. To date, I have heard from no one. I thought it was me, so I inquired around some of other folks working on this issue, including the AMA, and none of the organizations I contacted have heard of any cases either.
So what’s going on? Do the insurance companies not know of this loophole? That’s doubtful given the hundreds of lawyers, accounts and actuaries they employ, many of whose sole mission is to uncover these exact types of loopholes to save their middle managers a few hundred thousand a year. Could it be that the insurance companies have some scruples and are not choosing to exploit bikers? That’s not likely either. In a closed door meeting I had with some of the original authors of this rule, they confessed that they think of this loophole as sort of an urban legend. Very little is known about why the original HIPAA bill included the source of injury rule, and very little is known about any actual examples of the rule being used by insurance companies, yet there is a lot of talk about it around the country. Undeniable is the fact that the loophole does exist and could one day be used, and if so it would spell the end of motorcycling as we know it.
One thing this final rule does carve in stone is the need for a legislative fix. In fact, in that closed door meeting with the folks at the Department of Labor and HHS they revealed that they, as an agency, don’t have the legal authority to close this loophole. In fact, if they did close it they feel that the insurance companies would sue and win, therefore making any chance at passing a legislative fix all that much more difficult. This sentiment was originally express by long time biker turned politico Tommy Thompson when he held the top spot at HHS a few years back. So I have every reason to believe the rank and file agency paper pushers are telling the truth.
So we have some work cut out for us in order to close this loophole before it does become a widespread problem. Legislation is being re-drafted and will soon be re-introduced in both bodies of Congress. When that happens, the push will once again resume toward fixing this loophole. However, Congress is going to want actual examples before they legislate the insurance industry. Without those examples, we have an uphill battle. Congress isn’t likely to waste valuable time and resources on something that may not be a problem right now, as that’s just the shortsighted nature of our Congress.
So to answer my own question, it just got worse.
You can read the final rule in the Federal Register Volume 71, Number 239.
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html
IN OTHER NEWS . . .
NHTSA recently had a meeting of the Motorcycle Awareness Subcommittee, a smaller
core of individuals that regularly attend the quarterly meetings held at the
safety agency.
This inaugural meeting was attended by yours truly, AMA, MSF, and the motor
vehicle administrators and a host of NHTSA folks. We began with the intention
of addressing motorcycle awareness campaigns and came up with what NHTSA calls
a “planner”. This planner will be a host of templates of press releases,
event ideas, campaign slogans and posters, PSA and other items geared at promoting
“May is motorcycle awareness month.” The planner will be available
this spring for public consumption. The MRF will be reviewing the proposed planner
later this winter and will be able to sign off on it before it’s revealed.
We should all be looking forward to this helpful tool.
NEWBIE GREENIE
President Bush has tapped Molly O’Neill to serve as the Environmental Protection Agency’s assistant administrator for the Office of Environmental Information, replacing Kim Nelson, who left the agency late last year. O’Neill is currently the state director for the Environmental Council of States’ National Environmental Information Exchange Network, a jointly-governed initiative between the EPA and state governmental agencies that shares and exchanges data over the Internet. Before joining ECOS, O’Neill was an environmental consultant for 14 years, working on organizational and performance assessments, measures, business process re-engineering, and large-scale information management system implementation projects. She received a bachelor’s degree in biology from Virginia Tech. In her statement before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, she didn’t mention any radical changes she would like to see or any other red flags. My guess is it will be business as usual with the Environmental Protection Agency.
IS DETROIT BACK IN BUSINESS?
The new chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee is going to do everything he can to bring back the glory days of the Motor City. Detroit is far from the powerhouse it once was, losing countless jobs and dollars to Toyota and others. Chairman John Dingell (D-MI), a hometown Detroit boy, is often referred to as the dean of the House, mainly because of his career as a House member for over fifty years. He just won his 27th term and is currently the longest-serving member of the House. He has sworn to defend his automaker constituents, which does seem admirable. However, one of the ways he plans to breathe new life into the Big Three automakers is on the backs of the American consumer and the rights of the automobile owner. Last Congress, Dingell was one of the most outspoken opponents of the Right To Repair Act. He routinely tried his best to torpedo it in committee and was often persuasive enough to win the support of his Democrat allies. Now they are running the committee with Dingell at the wheel, so don’t expect to see any movement on the Right to Repair Act, which was HR 2048 in the 109th Congress, or any protection for smaller independent repair shops that are struggling to exist alongside a massive dealership network.
Ethics Debate Begins
The US Senate began debate this week on a hot button election issue, ethics
in Washington. S. 1, sponsored by both party leaders of the upper body of Congress,
was introduced on Tuesday and it’s off to the traditional slow Senate
start. Debate is likely to run for a few weeks if not the whole month of January.
Of concern to the grass roots lobbying community are provisions that have been
floated in the past, but never actual introduced, that would require excessive
lobbying activity reports from every registered lobbyist in the Nations Capitol.
By excessive I mean just plain crazy, including things like reporting to the
Clerk of the House and Senate every email, fax, phone call, personal conversation
with every elected official and staff. Ethics are a good thing and reform is
needed but collecting information just for the sake of collecting is not only
ridiculous it is nearly impossible. It would also induce an environment in Washington
where possibly more mischief would emerge. Senate support was initially high
for some expansion of the data currently collected from lobbyists but that support
has eroded as groups, like the MRF, have been throwing cold water on the issue.
Its difficult to predict the future of congress, but barring any more high profile
lobby scandals, the ethics reform package that will eventually pass should not
have any adverse effect on how the MRF or any other grassroots political activists
gets things done.
The MRF will continue to keep you updates on issues impacting motorcycling
from the Nations Capitol. -JH
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit http://www.mrf.org/subscribe.php
Ride With The Leaders by joining the MRF at http://www.mrf.org/join.php or call 1-202-546-0983.
Visit the new MRF online shopping store at https://mrf.org/shop for the latest in MRF goodies.
Register online for all MRF conferences at http://www.mrf.org/events.php
Send your nominations and donations for the MRF's Young Activist Scholarship to http://www.mrf.org/yascholarship.php
Sign up today for the MRF's new roadside assistance program by visiting http://www.mrf.org/mrfroadside.php
(c)All Information contained in this release is copyrighted. Reproduction permitted
with attribution. The Motorcycle Riders Foundation, incorporated in 1987, is
a membership-based, national motorcyclists' rights organization headquartered
in Washington, DC. The first motorcyclists' rights organization to establish
a full-time presence in Washington, DC, the Motorcycle Riders Foundation is
the only Washington voice devoted exclusively to the street rider. The MRF established
MRFPAC in the early 1990s to advocate the election of candidates who would champion
the cause of rider safety and rider freedom.
________________________________________
The MRF Reports is an official publication of the Motorcycle Riders Foundation.
All rights reserved. The print version is published six times per year and distributed
nationwide.
Articles from the MRF Reports which are posted here may be reprinted, with attribution
to the author and to the Motorcycle Riders Foundation, for non-profit uses.
Opinions expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect
those of the Motorcycle Riders Foundation or its officers.